I have heard and read of scientists expressing their concerns about the new GCSE science courses.
The comments by Sir Richard Sykes and others that were highlighted in the media in the autumn of 2006 were based on an incomplete and inaccurate account of Twenty First Century Science in a book put out by the Institute of Ideas.
Twenty First Century Science has received support from a wide range of quarters:
Lord Adonis, Schools Minister wote: "The Government supports the introduction of the new key stage 4 programme of study for science. It is as rigorous as the previous one; it is more engaging for all pupils; and it provides a sound basis for study of science at A-level and beyond."
Sir Roland Jackson, Chief Executive, British Association of the Advancement of Science wrote: "The strength of the 21st Century Science model is that it meets the needs, through flexible options, of those who will go on to be professional scientists and of those who will not"
Professor Michael Reiss, Director of Education, Royal Society wrote: "The new suite will offer a greater range of options to meet the diverse needs and aspirations of young people. The Royal Society has welcomed this increased range"
